Criminals will never reveal their next move when it comes to laundering illicit funds gained through corruption, fraud, embezzlement, or drug trafficking. To stay ahead of them, financial institutions also need to rely on systems that can quietly watch suspicious transactions in real time without knowing them. Transaction monitoring is one such essential tool that works in the background to detect and prevent suspicious transactions and help financial institutions stop money laundering activities before they take root.
A weaker AML monitoring system often raises many concerns over the capability of transaction monitoring in AML detecting and generating red alerts against suspicious transactions. Does the AML transaction monitoring system really help businesses detect unusual transactions or is it just an extra burden on the compliance officers to manually check the higher rate of false positive and false negative rates?
This piece of writing will highlight the importance of transaction monitoring systems in the fight against money laundering, its importance and what are the reasons for causing higher rates of false positive and false negative rates.
In a financial system such as banks, insurance companies, and foreign exchangers, A system that background checks all ins and outs of the financial transaction, including the monitoring and analyzing the legitimacy of the transaction broadly known as the AML transaction monitoring system.
As the purpose of transaction monitoring is to detect suspicious transactions, report them to the relevant department, and suggest the solutions against such unusual transactions, one can say that Transaction monitoring is the spymaster in the fight against money laundering crimes.
What if it is optional for businesses to implement the AML transaction monitoring system or not depending on the business choice and requirements? Would you prefer to not incorporate the monitoring system when you have to handle thousands of financial transactions?
Realistically, the transaction monitoring system in AML though not a choice, but the financial institution must not think this is a compliance requirement. The system is the real protector against money laundering and terrorist finance crime.
Therefore, financial institutions must invest in their resources handling financial transactions and incorporate the Advance AML monitoring system such as AML Watcher provides to make sure you are not leaving any loopholes for criminals to launder.
As the transaction monitoring system is a systematic approach implemented by financial institutions to scrutinize every transaction made by their millions of clients in real-time, the system must be free from generating false positive and false negative results to make the transaction monitoring process more accurate and precise.
The transaction monitoring process starts by knowing the risk level every customer or business partner can pose. What businesses have to do at this stage is to evaluate the customer profile for risk assessment and then implement the requirement measures against the higher-risk individual.
If one of your customers is from nowhere, start depositing and withdrawing the unusual money. Sending a huge amount of money and sending to a suspicious person the money, the system must consider it as the suspicions and unusual behavior that could lead to money laundering and other financial crimes.
The advanced AML monitoring system allows institutions to make their own set of rules and regulations for transaction monitoring systems.
So if the financial institution monitoring requirements differ from the one set in the default monitoring program, the firm should set their own set of rules and ensure that the monitoring process incorporated in your system meets the compliance requirements set by the AML regulations.
Knowing which transaction is legal and what is being made with bad intentions is very essential for financial institutions. Therefore, financial institutions must monitor every transaction made by their customer or using their institutions to ensure that suspicious transactions do not go unnoticed.
Some financial institutions implement strict AML monitoring rules and regulations to avoid regulatory fines and reputational damage. And that strict and rigid regulations often increase the chances of a higher rate of False positives and false negatives, which often flag the legitimate transaction as illegal.
So not all the monitoring systems generate false positives. With weaker monitoring systems or rigid base regulations the system generates false positives.